RU EN

Page menu:

Kurhinen Yu. P., Panchenko D. V., Karpin V. A. The impact of Forest Management on Moose Abundance and Distribution in Eastern Fennoscandia

Keywords:
Alces alces, numbers, territorial distribution, forest structure, forestry

Abstract

UDC 630.624+639.111.16(470.22+480)

How to cite: Kurhinen Yu. P.1, 2, Panchenko D. V.3, Karpin V. A.1 The impact of forest management on moose abundance and distribution in Eastern Fennoscandia // Sibirskij Lesnoj Zurnal (Sib. J. For. Sci.). 2025. N. 3. P. … (in Russian with English abstract and references).

DOI: 10.15372/SJFS20250310

EDN: …

© Kurhinen Yu. P., Panchenko D. V., Karpin V. A., 2025

The article analyzes the impact of forest management (primarily industrial logging) on ​​the habitat structure and territorial distribution of the moose (Alces alces Gray) in the taiga landscapes of Eastern Fennoscandia (Eastern Finland and the Republic of Karelia). Materials of population counts (Winter Track Account) and forest inventory data were used. Higher population values ​​are noted in the landscapes of the western part of the studied region that are intensively used by the forestry industry. A positive relationship is noted between the WTC index and the representation of deciduous and mixed young stands (R = от 0.30 до 0.45) and a consistently negative relationship with the proportion of bog area (R = –0.78; p < 0.01). There are significant differences in the patterns of moose distribution in different parts of the studied region. The results of modeling the territorial distribution of moose depending on the habitat structure are considered: step-by-step multiple regression analysis of the influence of natural and anthropogenic factors. The calculations used 17 independent variables characterizing the structure of forest vegetation, and the index of WTC of moose as a dependent variable. In statistical models of multiple regression, the effective regressors are the proportion of mature forests, the representation of open bogs, the proportion of agricultural lands, the proportion of secondary middle-aged forests and the proportion of clear-cuts. Anthropogenic transformation of forest landscapes generally has a positive effect on the number and distribution of the moose population, especially in the early stages of forest industry development of taiga forest. At the same time, not only forest management, but also other forms of anthropogenic impact have a significant impact (ambiguous in the border regions of the two countries).

Article


СПИСОК ЛИТЕРАТУРЫ (REFERENCES)

Анненков В. Г., Данилов П. И. Некоторые материалы по питанию и лесохозяйственному значению лося в Карелии // Науч. конф. биол. Карелии, посвящ. 50-летию образов. СССР: тез. докл. Петрозаводск: [б. и.], 1972. С. 179–180 [Annenkov V. G., Danilov P. I. Nekotorye materialy po pitaniyu i lesokhozyaystvennomu znacheniyu losya v Karelii (Some materials on the nutrition and forestry significancy of moose in Karelia) // Nauch. konf. biol. Karelii, posvyashch. 50-letiyu obrazov. SSSR (Sci. Conf. Biol. Karelia, dedicated 50th Anniv. Form. USSR): Abstr. Petrozavodsk: [b. i.], 1972. P. 179–180 (in Russian)].

Курхинен Ю. П. Воздействие интенсивной лесоэксплуатации на териокомплексы биогеоценозов европейской средней тайги // Влияние антропогенной трансформации ландшафта на население наземных позвоночных животных: Тез. Всес. совещ. М.: Б. и., 1987а. С. 61–65 [Kurkhinen Yu. P. Vozdeystvie intensivnoy lesoekspluatatsii na teriokompleksy biogeotsenozov evropeyskoy sredney taygi (The impact of intensive forest exploitation on the teriocomplexes of biogeocenoses of the European middle taiga) // Vliyanie antropogennoy transformatsii landshafta na naselenie nazemnykh pozvonochnykh zhivotnykh: Tez. Vses. soveshch. (The influence of anthropogenic transformation of the landscape on the population of terrestrial vertebrates: Abstr. All-Union Workshop). Moscow: B. i., 1987а. P. 61–65 (in Russian)].

Курхинен Ю. П. Воздействие сплошных концентрированных рубок на кормовые ресурсы и численность растительноядных млекопитающих Карелии // Влияние хозяйственного освоения лесных территорий Европейского Севера на население животных. Сб. ст. М., Наука, 1987б. С. 18–31 [Kurkhinen Yu. P. Vozdeystvie sploshnykh kontsentrirovannykh rubok na kormovye resursy i chislennost’ rastitel’noyadnykh mlekopitayushchikh Karelii (The impact of concentrated clear-cuts on food resources and the number of herbivorous mammals in Karelia) // Vliyanie khozyaystvennogo osvoeniya lesnykh territoriy Evropeyskogo Severa na naselenie zhivotnykh. Sb. st. (The impact of economic development of forest areas in the European North on the animal population. Coll. articl.). Moscow: Nauka (Science), 1987b. P. 18–31 (in Russian)].

Курхинен Ю. П., Данилов П. И., Ивантер Э. В. Млекопитающие Восточной Фенноскандии в условиях антропогенной трансформации таежных экосистем. М.: Наука, 2006. 205 с. [Kurkhinen Yu. P., Danilov P. I., Ivanter E. V. Mlekopitayushchie Vostochnoy Fennoskandii v usloviyakh antropogennoy transformatsii taezhnykh landshaftov (Mammals of East Fennoscandia in the context of anthropogenic transformation of taiga ecosystems). Moscow: Nauka (Science), 2006. 205 p. (in Russian)].

Ломанов И. К. Факторы, влияющие на распределение населения лося в Центральном экономическом районе // Биологические основы охраны и воспроизводства охотничьих ресурсов: Сб. науч. тр. M.: ЦНИЛ Главохоты РСФСР, 1987. С. 54–57 [Lomanov I. K. Faktory, vliyayushchie na raspredelenie naseleniya losya v Tsentral’nom ekonomicheskom rayone (Factors affecting the distribution of moose population in the Central economic region) // Biologicheskie osnovy okhrany i vosproizvodstva okhotnich’ikh resursov: Sb. nauch. tr. (Biological bases of protection and reproduction of hunting resources: Coll. sci. works). Moscow: TSNIL Glavokhoty RSFSR (Central Sci. Res. Lab. Main Hunting Adm. Rus. Sov. Fed. Soc. Rep.), 1987. P. 54–57 (in Russian)].

Ломанов И. К. Закономерности динамики численности и размещения населения лося в европейской части России. М.: Изд-во ЦНИЛ Охотдепарт. МСХиП РФ, 1995. 60 с. [Lomanov I. K. Zakonomernosti dinamiki chislennosti i razmeshcheniya naseleniya losya v evropeyskoy chasti Rossii (Patterns of the dynamics of the number and distribution of the moose population in the European part of Russia). Moscow: Izd-vo TSNIL Okhotdepart. MSKHiP RF (Central Sci. Res. Lab. Ministry Agr. Nat. Manag. Rus. Fed.), 1995. 60 p. (in Russian)].

Марковский В. А. Копытные Карелии (современное состояние популяции): Автореф. дис. … канд. биол. наук (в виде научного доклада): 03.00.08. Петрозаводск: Ин-т биол. Карел. науч. центра РАН, 1995. 32 с. [Markovskiy V. A. Kopytnye Karelii (sovremennoe sostoyanie populyatsii): avtoref. dis. … kand. biol. nauk (v vide nauchnogo doklada) (Ungulates of Karelia (current state of the population): Cand. Biol. Sci. (PhD) thesis (in the form of scientific report): Zoology. Petrozavodsk: In-t biol. Karel. nauch. tsentra RAN (Inst. Biol. Karel. Sci. Center Rus. Acad. Sci.), 1995. 32 p. (in Russian)].

Никифоров Л. П., Гибет Л. А. Воздействие лося на возобновление сосны в Карелии // Роль диких копытных животных в лесном хозяйстве: Cooбщ. Ин-та леса АН СССР. Вып. 13. М.: Изд-во АН СССР, 1959. С. 58–62 [Nikiforov L. P., Gibet L. A. Vozdeystvie losya na vozobnovlenie sosny v Karelii (The impact of moose on pine regeneration in Karelia) // Rol’ dikikh kopytnykh zhivotnykh v lesnom khozyaystve: Soobshch. In-ta lesa AN SSSR. Vyp. 13. (The role of wild ungulates in forestry: Comm. Inst. For. USSR Acad. Sci. Iss. 13). Moscow: Izd-vo AN SSSR (USSR Acad. Sci. Publ.), 1959. P. 58–62 (in Russian)].

Приклонский С. Г. Зимний маршрутный учет охотничьих животных // Методы учета охотничьих животных в лесной зоне. Тр. Окского гос. заповед. Вып. 9. Рязань: Моск. раб. Рязан. отд-ние, 1973. С. 35–62 [Priklonskiy S. G. Zimniy marshrutny uchet okhotnich’ikh zhivotnykh (Winter route census of game animals) // Metody ucheta okhotnich’ikh zhivotnykh v lesnoy zone. Tr. Okskogo gos. zapoved. Vyp. 9 (Methods for accounting game animals in the forest zone. Proc. Oksky St. Nat. Res. Iss. 9). Ryazan': Mosk. rab. Ryazan. otd-nie (Moscow worker. Ryazan Br.), 1973. P. 35–62 (in Russian)].

Смирнов К. А. Формирование южно-таежных фитоценозов при высокой плотности популяции лося // Лесоведение. 1989. № 3. С. 37–45 [Smirnov K. A. Formirovanie yuzhno-taezhnykh fitotsenozov pri vysokoy plotnosti populyatsiiy losya (Formation of southern taiga phytocenoses with a high density of moose population) // Lesovedenie (For. Sci.). 1989. N. 3. P. 37–45 (in Russian with English abstract)].

Смирнов К. А. Воздействие лося на динамику лесных фитоценозов // Лесоведение. 1994. № 1. С. 22–31 [Smirnov K. A. Vozdeystvie losya na dinamiku lesnykh fitotsenozov (The impact of moose on the dynamics of forest phytocenoses) // Lesovedenie (For. Sci.). 1994. N. 1. P. 22–31 (in Russian with English abstract)].

Сорокина Л. И. Учет копытных // Охота и охотн. хоз-во. 1977. N 12. С. 35 [Sorokina L. I. Uchet kopytnyh (Ungulates census) // Okhota i okhotn. khoz-vo (Hunting and Hunt. Econ.). 1977. N. 12. P. 35 (in Russian)].

Тимофеева Е. К. Лось (экология, распространение, хозяйственное значение). Л.: Изд-во Ленингр. ун-та, 1974. 168 с. [Timofeeva E. K. Los’ (ekologiya, rasprostranenie, khozyaystvennoe znachenie) (Moose (ecology, distribution, economic importance)). Leningrad: Izd-vo Leningr. un-ta (Leningrad St. Univ. Publ.), 1974. 168 p. (in Russian)].

Филонов Л. П. Лось. М: Лесн. пром-сть, 1983. 248 с. [Filonov L. P. Los’ (Moose). Moscow: Lesn. prom-st’ (For. Industry), 1983. 248 p. (in Russian)].

Юргенсон П. Б. Биологические основы охотничьего хозяйства в лесах. М.: Лесн. пром-сть, 1973. 172 с. [Yurgenson P. B. Biologicheskie osnovy okhotnich’ego khozyaystva v lesakh (Biological foundations of hunting in forests). Moscow: Lesn. prom-st’ (For. Industry), 1973. 172 p. (in Russian)].

Kurhinen Yu., Danilov P., Gromtsev A., Helle P., Lindèn H. Patterns of black grouse Tetrao tetrix distribution in northwestern Russia at the turn of the millennium // Folia Zool. 2009. V. 58. N. 2. P. 168–172.

Lindèn H., Helle E., Helle P., Wikman M. Wildlife triangle scheme in Finland: Methods and aims for monitoring wildlife populations // Fin. Game Res. 1996. V. 49. P. 4–11.

Lindèn H., Danilov P., Gromtsev A., Helle P., Ivanter E., Kurhinen J. Large-scale corridors to connect the taiga fauna to Fennoscandia // Wildlife Biol. 2000. N. 6. P. 179–188.


Return to list